Course(s) Used:
- Team and Small Group Communication
Goals and Objectives:
- Students understand the variety of forms of power and situations involving power, including the societal fantasy of equal power.
- Students know the 5 bases of power described by French and Raven.
- Students are able to list examples of people with each form of power.
- Students gain experience with coding and rater reliability, which are common techniques in Communication research.
Rationale:
Students bring a variety of misconceptions about power into communication classes. A more fine-grained understanding of power and its influences on people is helpful in a large number of real-world situations.
Materials Needed
Materials:
- None
Technology:
- Classroom computer and projector
Outline of the Lesson
- Review of previous session's content
- Power in groups and teams works differently than we think
- Power is never equal
- Power differences are not necessarily bad
- Power is not constant: it depends on situation
- Power is not monolithic, there are different forms
- French and Raven created the most influential way of describing the bases of power1
- Hands on group work: "Power Bases in Tweets"
- Students are assigned to pairs or small groups of three
- Groups should all analyze tweets from the same person, but on different days
- Each group is assigned a day of tweets to look at (no more than 10 from that day)
- Students are instructed to include original tweets only, not retweets.
- For each tweet, the group should:
- Read the tweet as a group
- Decide individually what base of power they would categorize the tweet in
- Compare their categorizations
- Discuss and decide which categorization they believe is best
- Record their final determination as a group
- Discussion Questions:
- How many tweets did your group have in each category?
- How easy was it to categorize the tweets?
- What base of power do they use most often? Least? Why?
- Lesson closing
Limitations
Requires that students have access to a device capable of accessing Twitter.
Variations and Accommodations
Follow guidance from local accommodation authorities.
French, J. & Raven, B. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.) Studies in social power (pp. 150--167). Institute for Social Research.↩
Both reward power and coercive power represent classical conditioning in Psychology.↩
Both reward power and coercive power represent classical conditioning in Psychology.↩